Mr. President: Please lead on the deficit

The message below emailed to President Obama White House on February 26, 2011.  

Dear Mr. President:

I just watched a recording of your weekly address on CSPAN and another by Senator Rob Portman. Senator Portman made many statements that can be challenged, but he did stress that your recently submitted budget failed to address seriously the deficit problem and follow the recommendations of your deficit commission. His address was far more effective than yours.

I have heard this complaint from others and agree with them. I am deeply disappointed that you have chosen to kick the deficit can down the road.

I have also heard the you have chosen to play a game of political gotcha, in which you will wait for Republicans to make deficit reduction proposals and then savage them in the 2012 campaign. This is morally wrong and politically unwise.

I am a life-long Democrat who has always advocated fiscal responsibility. I urge you to exert real leadership, get out ahead, and meet the deficit challenge.

Respectfully, Bill Allen

Saturday at 1059P

Posted in Politics | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Tax Simplification and the Plain Tax

This proposal was originally posted on the website Dead River Journal.

The president’s deficit commission chaired by Erskine Bowles and Alan Simpson issued its report in December.  It concluded that meeting the debt challenge will require both reductions in spending and increases in revenue.  For the latter it recommended that the tax code be simplified and that the incremental revenue be used to reduce the deficit and lower tax rates.

I have believed this for a long time and am glad to see support developing in Washington.  Attached is a draft of a proposal I plan to send to key members of Congress and Whitehouse staff.  Please review the proposal and let me have your comments.  Thanks.

Go to Tax Simplification and the PlainTax.

Bill Allen,    February 6, 2011

Posted in Taxes | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

For many species, no escape as the termperature rises

Plant and animal species are adapted to the climates of the regions in which they live. Fossil records show that species have changed over millions of years. Some of these changes have been biological adaptations to climate changes. The adaptation process is called “evolution”, and it’s very slow.

Temperatures are rising more rapidly than most species can evolve and adapt. In theory, a plant or animal in the northern hemisphere can move its range north to cooler climate; a species in the southern hemisphere can move south; and one on a mountain side can move up the mountain. An article in the NT Times by Elizabeth Rosenthal with the title above describes the move strategy and some birds and mammals that are experiencing rising temperatures. The title suggests, and the article’s content shows that many are not doing very well.

Ms. Rosenthal writes that many biological scientists predict that 20 to 30 percent of species will be lost if the average global temperature rises 3.6 to 5.4 degrees F. [This range of increase is 2 to 3 degrees C. Many climate scientists believe that average temperature will increase by this amount or more.]

She describes the move strategy and includes two quantitative examples.
•In Yosemite National Park there is an animal survey spanning 100 years. Half the mountain species have moved their habitats up by an average of 550 yards to find cooler ground.
•The pica is a small mammal that lives among stones on mountain sides. One study reported that they are moving up the slope at a rate of 160 yards per decade.

There are two take-aways from this article:
•These gradual moves to cooler habitats prove that some regional temperatures are rising, strong evidence of overall global warming.
•One cost of this warming is species loss and a decline in biodiversity.

I invite you to read the whole article.

Bill Allen, 01-26-11 revised

Posted in Climate | Tagged | Leave a comment

$80 solar power system in rural Kenya

In yesterday’s New York Times, Elisabeth Rosenthal, reports on getting electricity to a farming village far from Kenya’s electric grid.

For Sara Ruto, the desperate yearning for electricity began last year with the purchase of her first cellphone, a lifeline for receiving small money transfers, contacting relatives in the city or checking chicken prices at the nearest market.

Every week, Ms. Ruto walked two miles to hire a motorcycle taxi for the three-hour ride to Mogotio, the nearest town with electricity. There, she dropped off her cellphone at a store that recharges phones for 30 cents. Yet the service was in such demand that she had to leave it behind for three full days before returning.

That wearying routine ended in February when the family sold some animals to buy a small Chinese-made solar power system for about $80. Now balanced precariously atop their tin roof, a lone solar panel provides enough electricity to charge the phone and run four bright overhead lights with switches.

Since Ms. Ruto hooked up the system, her teenagers’ grades have improved because they have light for studying. The toddlers no longer risk burns from the smoky kerosene lamp. And each month, she saves $15 in kerosene and battery costs — and the $20 she used to spend on travel.

In fact, neighbors now pay her 20 cents to charge their phones, although that business may soon evaporate: 63 families in Kiptusuri have recently installed their own solar power systems.

“You leapfrog over the need for fixed lines,” said Adam Kendall, head of the sub-Saharan Africa power practice for McKinsey & Company.

Bill Kimzey,  12-25-10

Posted in Energy | Tagged | Leave a comment

Great "New Yorker" story on the failed energy bill

In the October 11, 2010 The New Yorker, Ryan Lizza, reports: “As the World Burns: How the Senate and the White House missed their best chance to deal with climate change.” I’ll quote from it extensively, but if you don’t subscribe, you should definitely go to the library and read this story.

On April 20, 2010, Kerry, Graham and Lieberman met with Rahm Emanuel in the White House. Several democrats were going to oppose the legislation. Emanuel asked: “How many Republicans did you bring on?” Kerry answered five, including Graham. More than the 60 required.

Now going back in time. In January 2009, Lieberman-McCain were working one bill, and Boxer another. McCain would back out in the face of a conservative talk-radio opponent running in the Arizona primary.

March 2009: a senior white house official told the reporter:

“You need to have something like T. Boone Pickens and All Gore holding hands.” In exchange for setting a cap on emissions, Democrats would agree to increase in the production of natural gas … the only thing Pickens … cared about.

If Republicans didn’t respond to the proposed deals, the White House could push them to the table by making a threat through the Environmental Protection Agency, which had recently been granted the power to regulated carbon, just as it regulates many other pollutants.

Continue reading

Posted in Energy | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Focus now on economic recovery. Set stage for long term fiscal health.

Article below is a slightly revised version of a letter I submitted on October 11 to the Bernardsville News for publication.  I have added a Chart.

An excellent and related column by Paul Krugman appears in the NY Times today.  Go to column.

Bill Allen,    October 11, 2010

EDITOR:

You published a letter from me on September 30 in which I made the factual case that, during the period from 1976 to 2008, the federal deficit as a ratio of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) grew under Republican administrations and declined under Democratic ones.  A writer on October 7 accepted the factual argument, but said we should look at what has happened under President Obama.

Let’s do this with numbers from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), and compare the deficit for the 2010 fiscal year that ended in September with fiscal 2007, the last year before the recession.  The deficit increased by $1.4 trillion, an alarming amount by any standard.  Major components follow.

  • A full 40% of the deficit increase was in two items:  reduced revenue (29%) and increased unemployment payouts (11%).  Both stem from the worst economic downturn since the 30s.
  • Defense and veterans services accounted for 16% of the deficit increase.
  • Medicare and Social Security also accounted for 16%.  These continue to grow and must be dealt with.
  • Stimulus spending is sprinkled throughout the budget and not identified explicitly.  It and everything else totaled $396 billion, 28% of the deficit increase,

Components above are displayed in the attached Chart.

Note that the first component above, that includes two items resulting directly from the poor economy, is larger than the fourth component, that includes stimulus spending in the 2010 fiscal year and other things.  This underscores the importance of assigning first priority to economic recovery.

The CBO projects budgets forward.  It shows the deficit as 9.1% of GDP in 2010, declining to 2.5% in 2014, and resuming a steady rise to 3.0% in 2020.

It is essential to stress that the CBO numbers are projections.  They are not a plan that any sane person is proposing.  We must do things that will change the projections and balance the federal budget over the long term.

The largest growth component is Medicare.  The healthcare bill passed this year is a step on the way to control of this component.  The non-partisan CBO is the official scorekeeper for this kind of thing.  It projects that the bill will reduce the deficit by a small amount, not increase it as the letter of October 7 claims.  But much more must be done.

Health insurers will no longer be able to profit from denial of coverage for people who most need it.  They can do constructive things, like providing better service and reducing administrative costs.

With no more fear and agony from not having coverage, we as a people can move calmly and rationally to build a healthcare system we can afford.

The healthcare bill was a critical first step.  We must go forward from it, not backward.

Bill Allen,    October 11, 2010

Posted in Economy | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Extend ALL tax rates for one more year

The message below was emailed to Senator Frank Lautenberg today, and similar messages were sent to Senator Robert Menendez and Representative Rodney Frelinghuysen. 

Dear Senator Lautenberg:

The National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform issued its first report yesterday. This was only a draft, but we can be sure that the final report will also include a mix of spending reductions and revenue increases.  They all should be considered carefully and this will require time.

The new House leadership will need time to demonstrate how it will achieve its spending and revenue goals.

The short lame-duck session of Congress is not an appropriate time to make long-term tax decisions.  It is also not the time to engage in prolonged argument about matters that do not have long-term significance.

Therefore, I recommend that you adopt legislation during the lame-duck session that will extend ALL tax rates for one more year.

Do not extend them for two years, because an election year is also not a good time to make tax decisions.

Thank you for considering this proposal.

Bill Allen, 11-11-10

Posted in Taxes | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Senator Robert Menendez Supports EPA Authority to Control CO2

I received a notice from EDF that Senator Jay Rockefeller had introduced legislation to curtail authority that EPA now has to regulate emissions of CO2 and other greenhouse gases. I sent email messages to Senators Lautenberg and Menendez with the request that they oppose this. The response from Senator Menendez is the first message below and mine is second.

The prompt reply from Senator Menendez and its content are very encouraging. I have highlighted two comments in his message that I believe are particularly significant.

Bill Allen,    10-04-10

Continue reading

Posted in Politics | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Elect Democrats to Reduce Federal Deficit

Letter below was published in the Bernardsville News on 09-30-10.

EDITOR:

Most thoughtful people are worried about federal debt.  Unfortunately, some of these are listening to professional fear-mongers and are looking in the wrong direction for solutions.

I will show that those who want to take constructive steps to improve the debt situation, and not just worry about it, should support Democrats for Congress in the coming election.

Before moving on I want to say that the Republicans with whom I served on the Bernards Township Committee were fiscally responsible.  Nothing here should be interpreted as criticism of local officials.

Republican leaders in Washington are a different breed.  Three decades of history show that they lack both the wisdom and the courage to do those things necessary to deal with federal debt.

Let’s look at the numbers.  The federal debt at the end of 1976 was $0.65 trillion, and at the end of 2008 was $10.5 trillion.  It increased by a factor of 16.  Gross domestic product (GDP) also increased, but only half as much.  Because the economy grows and there is inflation, the best way to measure the debt problem is to divide it by GDP.  Call this the “debt ratio.”

This ratio increased from 36% at the end of 1976 to 73% at the end of 2008.  During these 32 years we had two Democratic and three Republican administrations.  Outcomes follow.

During 4 Carter years, the ratio declined 1.7% per year.

During 12 Reagan and Bush years, the ratio rose 5.8% per year.

During 8 Clinton years, the ratio declined 1.6% per year.

During 8 Bush years, the ratio rose 3.1% per year.

Down, up, down, up.  The pattern is clear.  The federal debt ratio gets better during Democratic administrations, and it gets worse during Republican administrations.

For a chart, supporting data, and analysis go to Support Democrats ….

Suppose there is a bad accident at a busy intersection.  Emergency responders attend to the injured before they untangle the traffic.  Their priorities are right.

Some people look at the large annual deficits today, become frightened, and focus on those deficits.  This is a mistake.  First priority now should be reviving the economy.

Actions in 2009 probably headed off a depression.  But recovery is slow, perhaps because the magnitude of the problem was under-estimated and the actions taken were too timid.  We will need a healthy economy to move effectively to reduce long-term debt.

The record since 1976 shows that Democrats deal better with federal debt than Republicans.  It’s nonsense for Republicans to pretend today that they will do better.  Nothing in the record supports their claim.

President Obama established a bipartisan deficit commission in February with the charge to make proposals to “balance the budget … and … improve the long-term fiscal outlook.”  It will report its recommendations in December.  The next Congress must review and discuss these carefully, and then work with the administration to draft and adopt appropriate legislation.

This won’t happen if Republicans control Congress. There will be gridlock.  The country will have to wait at least two more years before seeing constructive action to deal with federal debt.

Most of us are very frustrated by the weak economy and the large debt, and some are very angry.  But any voter, who wants more to solve problems than to vent anger, should vote for the Democratic candidates for Congress.

In our region these are Doug Herbert, Rush Holt, and Ed Potosnak.

Bill Allen

Posted in Politics | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Support Democrats for Congress on Election Day

The letter below was published in the Bernardsville News on September 30.  For a look at a display of the relevant facts go to Federal Debt Ratio Chart.

EDITOR:

Most thoughtful people are worried about federal debt.  Unfortunately, some of these are listening to professional fear-mongers and are looking in the wrong direction for solutions.

I will show that those who want to take constructive steps to improve the debt situation, and not just worry about it, should support Democrats for Congress in the coming election.

Before moving on I want to say that the Republicans with whom I served on the Bernards Township Committee were fiscally responsible.  Nothing here should be interpreted as criticism of local officials.

Republican leaders in Washington are a different breed.  Three decades of history show that they lack both the wisdom and the courage to do those things necessary to deal with federal debt.

Let’s look at the numbers.  The federal debt at the end of 1976 was $0.65 trillion, and at the end of 2008 was $10.5 trillion.  It increased by a factor of 16.

Gross domestic product (GDP) also increased, but only half as much.  Because the economy grows and there is inflation, the best way to measure the debt problem is to divide it by GDP.  Call this the “debt ratio.”

This ratio increased from 36% at the end of 1976 to 73% at the end of 2008.  During these 32 years we had two Democratic and three Republican administrations.  Outcomes follow.

  • During four Carter years, the ratio declined 1.7% per year.
  • During twelve Reagan and Bush years, the ratio rose 5.8% per year.
  • During eight Clinton years, the ratio declined 1.6% per year.
  • During eight Bush years, the ratio rose 3.1% per year.

Down, up, down, up.  The pattern is clear.  The federal debt ratio gets better during Democratic administrations, and it gets worse during Republican administrations.

For a chart, supporting data, and analysis go to Federal Debt Ratio Chart and Federal Debt Ratio Analysis.

Suppose there is a bad accident at a busy intersection.  Emergency responders attend to the injured before they untangle the traffic.  Their priorities are right.

Some people look at the large annual deficits today, become frightened, and focus on those deficits.  This is a mistake.  First priority now should be reviving the economy.

Actions in 2009 probably headed off a depression.  But recovery is slow, perhaps because the magnitude of the problem was under-estimated and the actions taken were too timid.  We will need a healthy economy to move effectively to reduce long-term debt.

The record since 1976 shows that Democrats deal better with federal debt than Republicans.  It’s nonsense for Republicans to pretend today that they will do better.  Nothing in the record supports their claim.

President Obama established a bipartisan deficit commission in February with the charge to make proposals to “balance the budget … and … improve the long-term fiscal outlook.”  It will report its recommendations in December.  The next Congress must review and discuss these carefully, and then work with the administration to draft and adopt appropriate legislation.

This won’t happen if Republicans control Congress. There will be gridlock.  The country will have to wait at least two more years before seeing constructive action to deal with federal debt.

Most of us are very frustrated by the weak economy and the large debt, and some are very angry.  But any voter, who wants more to solve problems than to vent anger, should vote for the Democratic candidates for Congress.

In our region these are Doug Herbert, Rush Holt, and Ed Potosnak.

Bill Allen    September 30, 2010

Posted in Politics | Tagged , , | Leave a comment