Climate 101: Our Critical Atmosphere

This article is the first “session” in a series that will describe the science that underlies the concerns for climate change. Most of the data below are from the book “Is the Temperature Rising” by S. George Philander. [Philander 1998]

Abstract: Mars, Earth, and Venus have average surface temperatures of -64, +59, and +806 degrees Fahrenheit, respectively. Only 12% of the huge temperature difference between Earth and Venus can be explained by the difference in distance from the sun. 88% of this difference is caused by the difference in atmosphere. The Earth temperature is “just right” for us. Is it a good idea for us to change our atmosphere? A chart is attached.

Session 1: “It’s not too hot, not too cold, but just right!”

Continue reading

Posted in Science | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Climate Change: See It Now

“Although not every year had been as dramatic as this, the increasing frequency of draughts, severe flooding episodes, air pollution crises, heat-stress days, brownouts, and forest fires was already stretching the national treasury.”

Stephen Schneider wrote these words for the lead chapter “Shadows of the Climate Future” in his book Global Warming:  Are We Entering the Greenhouse Century?  The book was published in 1989 when Schneider was a scientist at the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, CO.  [Schneider 1989]

Extreme weather events this year suggest a strong affirmative answer to the question he raised 21 years ago in the sub-title of his book.  Are we experiencing the effects of global warming now?  A sampling of recent headlines and images follows.

Continue reading

Posted in Politics | Leave a comment

Senator Menendez on Climate and Energy

The letter below from Senator Robert Menendez is a response to a letter that I sent him on June 28 and posted with that date.  His letter is dated July 16, and I received it on August 23.

The positions Senator Menendez articulates in his letter are excellent overall.  I have put some particularly significant statements in bold.  The flaw I see is his apparent support for the system called “carbon cap-and-trade.”  [See 4th paragraph, last sentence.]  I doubt that Congress can ever draft and adopt legislation incorporating this system that will be effective and fair.  A system of “carbon fee-and-dividend” has a much better chance for success, and I make that case in several articles on this site.

Majority Leader Senator Harry Reid decided later in July that the American Power Act, that Senator Menendez refers to in his letter, did not have sufficient support and he tabled it for this session. 

Bill Allen, August 23, 2010

Continue reading

Posted in Politics | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Why OFF by 2050?

I’m old enough to remember when John Kennedy inspired the nation in 1961 and called for a program to land a man on the moon and bring him back safely to earth “before this decade is out.”  Neither he nor anyone else had more than general ideas on how to do this in 1961.  But the goal and the time to achieve it were things that everyone could understand.

This launched the Apollo program.  Americans rallied and met the challenge.  Along the way they invented new technologies and generated good American jobs.

The 60s were troubling times.  Apollo raised our spirits and renewed our confidence.

There is broad agreement among climate scientists that carbon dioxide [CO2] emitted by burning fossil fuels is increasing the concentration of  CO2 in the atmosphere and this is contributing to dangerous global warming.  There have been many proposals to reduce CO2 emissions and slow this warming.

Continue reading

Posted in Energy | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

In Crackdown on Energy Use, China to Shut 2,000 Factories

Above is the lead headline in the New York Times today.  Reporting from Hong Kong, journalist Keith Bradsher begins:

“Earlier this summer, Prime Minister Wen Jiabao of China promised to use an “iron hand” to improve his country’s energy efficiency, and a growing number of businesses are now discovering that it feels like a fist.”

Other exerpts follow.  For the whole article click article.

Continue reading

Posted in Energy | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Facts and Confusion: CO2 is Heavier than Coal

Carbon is an atom with atomic weight of 12. During combustion it combines with two oxygen atoms with atomic weight each of 16. The outcome is a CO2 molecule with atomic weight of 44. The molecule that results from the reaction is 3.7 times as heavy as the carbon atom alone.

Coal is a sedimentary rock that varies by location and type. It is mostly carbon, but not pure. The proportion of carbon varies from 60% in Lignite to 90% in Anthacite. A typical value for discussion purposes is 80%. [Ref Wikipedia article] Burning one ton of this typical coal will produce about three tons of CO2.

Calculation: 1 ton x 3.7 x 80% = 3 tons

Many have proposed that a tax or fee be imposed on the CO2 that is emitted from the burning of coal and other fossil fuels. They often suggest that the fee start low, say at $10 per ton of CO2, and rise by this amount each year. The fee on CO2 in Year 10 would be $100 per ton.

With this fee schedule for CO2, the fee on typical coal would be $30 per ton in Year 1 and $300 per ton in Year 10.

The average price of coal in the US in 2008 was about $30 per ton. [Source: US EIA] With this fee schedule, the fee for the CO2 would quickly dominate over the price of the coal before the fee.

This article will be bundled with others in a file called “Facts and Confusion.”. I will add to this file from time to time.

Bill Allen, August 7, 2010

Posted in Science | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

We’re Hot as Hell; Three Steps to …

The essay below is a response to the failure of the Senate to adopt or even vote on an energy bill in this session.  I downloaded  it  from www.350.org on August 6.  I have put some words in bold and inserted some  [comments in brackets].

The author, Bill McKibben, is founder of 350.org and the author, most recently, of Eaarth: Making a Life on a Tough New Planet. Earlier this year the Boston Globe called him “probably the country’s leading environmentalist” and Time described him as “the planet’s best green journalist.” He’s a scholar in residence at Middlebury College.

Bill Allen, August 6, 2010

We’re Hot as Hell and We’re Not Going to Take It Any More

Three Steps to Establish a Politics of Global Warming

Continue reading

Posted in Climate | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

The Deniers and the Duck

If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and squawks like a duck, it’s a duck.

This kernel of folk wisdom often comes to mind when I see or hear someone deny that the earth is warming and that we are contributing to this warming when we burn fossil fuels.  He or she is refusing to face obvious facts and the simple logic that connects them.

  • Scientists have understood for over a century how CO2 in the atmosphere works to reduce the escape into space of radiant energy from the earth’s surface.  This mechanism is now called ”greenhouse warming” and CO2 is a “greenhouse gas”.  When more energy is retained, the average global temperature rises.
  • Precise and reliable measurements show that the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere is steadily rising as the result of human activity, primarily the burning of fossil fuels.
  • Physical evidence of global warming is all around us.  From the Himalayas to the Andes glaciers are melting, as are the snows of Kilimanjaro.  Sea levels are rising from this meltwater and thermal expansion.  Summer sea ice is growing thinner in the Arctic and is expected to melt entirely.  Zones of hardiness in the northern hemisphere are moving northward.  Pine beetles, that in earlier years could not withstand the cold winters, are now destroying millions of acres of forest in the US and Canada.  Tropical diseases, like malaria and dengue fever, are moving north.

We understand the greenhouse warming mechanism and the role of CO2, we know that we are driving this mechanism by burning fossil fuel and adding CO2 to the atmosphere, and we know the earth is warming.  This is proof enough.

Reasonable people may disagree on the rate of this warming and how far it will go.  But the facts, that the earth is warming, we are contributing to the warming by burning fossil fuels, and we can reduce the burning and slow the warming, are beyond dispute.

Bill Allen,  August 3, 2010    <>    OFFby2050

Posted in Climate | Tagged | Leave a comment

Carbon Fee-and-Dividend; How It Works

Carbon Fee-and-Dividend;  How It Works

The best way to discourage the use of fossil fuels is to raise their prices.  Business leaders and economists have recommended a “carbon tax” for this purpose for many years.  A system called “carbon fee-and-dividend” will have a similar effect, but it will not be a tax.  Impose fees on all fossil fuels, collect them at the source [mine, well, port of entry], and return the revenues to the people as dividends.  There follows an analysis to illustrate how this system will work.

Continue reading

Posted in Energy | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Carbon Cap-and-Trade vs Fee-and-Dividend; Response to EDF

Below is an email message to a representative of EDF [Environmental Defense Fund]. It was the third in an exchange that began on July 12 with a message from me [posted below on July 12].  EDF has long promoted a system of carbon cap-and-trade and this was the basis for the legislation being considered in Congress. I have always thought this system was too complicated and ripe for abuse, and I support a system of carbon fee-and-dividend. In my message I outlined some pros and cons for the two systems and asked EDF to comment.

The message from EDF to which I respond below is posted on July 27.

Bill Allen, July 31, 2010    <>    OFFby2050

Continue reading

Posted in Politics | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment